Monday, January 30, 2006
Hope grows for captives in Iraq
Hope grows for those held captive in Iraq, according to this report. Please God that there is an end to such misery very soon. This site has sought to draw some attention to the Christian Peacemakers held captive by an unknown group known as Swords of Righteous Brigade. Please visit their site and express your support.
Technorati tags Captives Iraq Christian Peacemakers Swords of Righteous Brigade
Business gets stuck into the budget
Technorati tags Business Business Council of Australia Budget Australian Government Water Murray-Darling system Transport Greed
Friday, January 27, 2006
The angst and undercurrents of the reshuffle
For some years, the Beattie Government has been getting more bad publicity than money could buy from the mismanaged Qld health system. Added to this is the Dr Death scandal aided and abetted by ministerial heads rolling and incompetent rationalist bureaucrats. One thing is clear - it has taken a bit of the bounce out of Beattie.
But The Nats can't rest easy - even when by-elections give cause for comfort. Elections are a long way out and Beattie has many seats in hand. Labor came out of the 2004 elections with a majority of 37 seats. This got whittled away with the loss of two safe Labor seats to the Liberals at by-elections in 2005. The joker in the pack in Queensland is optional preferential voting.
The Nationals and the Liberals have difficulty working as a coalition in opposition and there is much acrimony. The Nats want to continue their dominance - but the Libs are comfortable with dominating Brisbane and don't want any intrustion on that. So the road to power for The Nats is iffy as it is undermined by Liberal-Nats acrimony and optional preferential voting.
Maccas bring on the generic worker
If numberless people are resourcing the one job at MacDonald's - who gets trained? Who gets recognised? Can another Charlie Bell emerge - or is this route to the top blocked?
It's common sense....it's the numbers, stupid
Wednesday, January 25, 2006
Smoke getting in your eyes?
Tuesday, January 24, 2006
We are amused
Photo acknowledgement: http://nla.gov.au/nla.pic-vn3158545
How reminiscent of 1975 when the ALP (Australian Labor Party) called foul over the actions of John Bjelke-Petersen, then the Premier of Queensland and Leader of the National Party in that state. John had decided to put a spoke in Gough Whitlam's wheel. A Queensland Senator died. This then left Gough, so he thought, with an ALP Senator to be appointed by convention from Queensland. The unwritten rule usually in play was that, in the case of a casual vacancy, someone from the same party would be nominated by whichever party is in power. The someone would be nominated by the party previously holding the casual vacancy. The government would then rubber stamp the nomination. But the trouble with unwritten rules is that they are easily broken rules. Joh manipulated the system and appointed a member of the ALP who almost no one had heard of - Albert Patrick (Pat) Field - and had not been nominated by the ALP. One thing about Pat Field is that no one could have accused him of being the sharpest knife in the drawer but he served his purpose and made his contribution to Whitlam's downfall.
So, Mark, seeds are sown and harvests are reaped. We reap what we sow. Now you know what happens when conventions get blown away and when people act in their own interests to overthrow and subvert them. Julian McGauran has made accusations that Barnaby Joyce's actions and his views have not been subjects of the usual conventions and processes. But then it is not only Julian McGauran you have to worry about. Your party is in decline. The Liberals tolerate the Nationals - but not very well. They don't need your numbers - they are so few - to form government. You keep yourself, no matter how much your vote and your representation declines, as a separate party, demanding privileges accruing to that status but not substantiated by numbers. Any wonder that Liberal members and Senators in rural and regional Australia complain that they have interests in portfolios kept aside for the National Party but are kept from the ministry and fully representing their electorate interests because of your special privilege. It is therefore open to question, Mark, whether your anger is for Julian McGauran alone. Is it because he told a home truth - that the National Party is not a Party of growth but the Liberal Party is? Or - and this might be more to the point - is it that a number has gone which is significant in percentage terms in a party of such slight representation. Is it that you face the question of how long you can even be considered a party in parliamentary terms? Is it that National Party clout will decline - especially in the Senate? If a National Party vote is subtracted by one and added to the Liberal numbers, what price Barnaby then? Is it that the vulnerability of the National Party is there for all to see? Is it that Julian McGauran's actions are the mirror image of those of Barnaby Joyce and both men are representative of clear divisions within the National Party that you can no longer paper over and for which you have no solution? In other words, while you are - through special pleading and privilege - trying to build up the credentials of the National Party on trade, the real issue is one that both McGauran and Joyce allude to - relevance.
Technorati Tags: Mark Vaile Julian McGauran Peter McGauran Barnaby Joyce Joh Bjelke-Petersen Gough Whitlam Albert Patrick Field Pat Field ALP Australian Labor Party DLP Democratic Labor Party NCC National Civic Council Liberal Party of Australia The Nationals The Nationals Queensland The Nationals Victoria
Wednesday, January 18, 2006
Nigel Kennedy has made the right decision
Technorati tags Nigel Kennedy Australia Australian citizenship
Meanwhile back in the First Nations......
- Democracy is government with the consent of the governed. The consent of aboriginal people is seldom considered in this country. In fact, until 1967, the Commonwonwealth of Australia constitutionally excluded them from the rights of citizenship. There is no Aboriginal representation in the Australian Parliament although in the Northern Territory of Australia representation of Aboriginal people in the Parliament (although they are clustered only in one party - and that party currently governs) almost exactly matches in proportion the Aboriginal component of the Territory's population. What sort of voice do Aboriginal people have in the government and governance of Australia?
- Economic participation. Voices are being raised in this regard. Two leading voices - although not the only ones - are Noel Pearson and Warren Mundine. Their voices need to be heard while recognising that while some of their points are universal in nature other items they discuss should not be taken as one size fits all. The other problem is that white politicians have been quick to grab on to some of Pearson's agenda - because they coincide with and reinforce their own agenda. Other ideas and other people whose ideas and experience are just as valid - and in some cases precede Pearson's - are sidelined. Whitefellas have to deal with themselves and remove themselves from centrestage.
Technorati tags Children
Child care Australia Democracy Aboriginal Noel Pearson Warren Mundine
The really want us to make babies but......
The Treasurer, Peter Costello, is planning to spend $9.2 billion on childcare over the next four years. How will this benefit the children in childcare, working parents, and ABC Learning Centres? Above all, how will it benefit women like Philippa Waters who have to withdraw from the workforce, withdraw from a promising career, withdraw from community productivity because the community which benefits from her workforce participation will not give her a fair go in childcare provision, costs, affordability and accessibility.
Technorati tags Childcare Child care Childcare rebate Child care rebate ABC Learning Centres Learning Care Group Peter Costello Philippa Waters
The Ugg is ours
Technorati tags Australia DayUgh BootsUgg Boots
Tuesday, January 17, 2006
- Teresa Gambaro: raised two children as a sole parent, said child care had not adapted to changing work patterns.
- Senator Judith Troeth: "I have a daughter with young children and lots of her friends would go back to work if they could find suitable child care," she said. "If the Government is serious about higher levels of productivity and getting and keeping women in the workforce, we should make child-care funding a higher priority." Senator Troeth called for incentives for business to provide care — such as scrapping fringe benefits tax on off-site child care that companies provide.
- Senate Whip Jeannie Ferris: renewed a call for the cost of nannies to be tax deductible.
"The cost of care for a second child makes it marginal for many women to return to work," she said. "I have never understood why deductibility can only apply if you pack up your child at 7.30am and take them off to care elsewhere." - Louise Markus: "Any improvements need to be responsive to the variety of child-care options that parents prefer and (should include) a more flexible approach to the delivery of child-care assistance."
- Bronwyn Bishop: said more should be done for those whose working hours meant they needed to use nannies or other private care arrangements for their children.
"All of our industrial relations and welfare-to-work amendments are offering more choice, and what we don't do in child care at the moment is offer choice," Mrs Bishop said. - Joanne Gash: said the rebate should be paid immediately.
And Barnaby Joyce has chipped in too calling for child-care rebates to be extended to cover kindergartens and nannies. Senator Joyce said many rural areas lacked a child-care centre or places, so parents were missing out on federal aid for the care of their children. Strange, he's saying what I was saying twenty years ago in north-west Queensland!
Child care Childcare Teresa Gambaro Judith Troeth Jeannie Ferris Louise Markus Barnaby Joyce Kackie Kelly Tanya Plibersek Working mothers Women and work Bronwyn Bishop Joanne Gash
More of Howard's women join childcare campaign
- Teresa Gambaro: raised two children as a sole parent, said child care had not adapted to changing work patterns.
- Senator Judith Troeth: "I have a daughter with young children and lots of her friends would go back to work if they could find suitable child care," she said. "If the Government is serious about higher levels of productivity and getting and keeping women in the workforce, we should make child-care funding a higher priority." Senator Troeth called for incentives for business to provide care — such as scrapping fringe benefits tax on off-site child care that companies provide.
- Senate Whip Jeannie Ferris: renewed a call for the cost of nannies to be tax deductible.
"The cost of care for a second child makes it marginal for many women to return to work," she said. "I have never understood why deductibility can only apply if you pack up your child at 7.30am and take them off to care elsewhere." - Louise Markus: "Any improvements need to be responsive to the variety of child-care options that parents prefer and (should include) a more flexible approach to the delivery of child-care assistance."
And Barnaby Joyce has chipped in too calling for child-care rebates to be extended to cover kindergartens and nannies. Senator Joyce said many rural areas lacked a child-care centre or places, so parents were missing out on federal aid for the care of their children. Strange, he's saying what I was saying twenty years ago in north-west Queensland!
Child care Childcare Jackie Kelly Janette Howard Tanya Plibersek Peter Costello Kay Patterson Steve Fielding Family First Working Mothers Women and work Barbara Pocock University of Adelaide Liberal Party of Australia Australian Labor Party Teresa Gambaro Judith Troeth Jeannie Ferris Louise Markus Barnaby Joyce
They're going at it over at Tim Blair
Monday, January 16, 2006
70% of Australian mothers work in the paid economy
As women have moved into the workforce and more have moved into professional and high-ranking executive positions, childcare issues have become more pervasive. Also contributing to this has been a more widespread interest on the part of male spouses in involvement in the lives of their children - some even forsaking work in the paid economy to become full-time stay-at-home fathers. All this, however, will not drive things as far as economy necessity in the eyes of the rationalists at Treasury coupled with the Treasurer's eye on the swinging voter embedded in the middle socio-economic cohort.
Now Liberal backbencher and former Minister, Jackie Kelly, has come out and put the matter bluntly: childcare is a shambles. She is supported in her comments by the ALP's Tanya Plibersek. Both are mums of young children. They speak from their own experience as well as listening to the experience of others. Imagine the picture if you will. These members of parliament - Jackie and Tanya - turn up to deliver and pick-up kids from child care. They get into conversations with other parents. These parents - if they have gripes, and they do - would open up to such influential women who have similar responsibilities. Now try to put Peter Costello in the picture. Peter - has he ever turned up to pick up the kids from child care, hung around and got into conversation with the mums and dads and listened to the consumer. Bit of a stretch, I'm afraid. Costello has his own agenda for before and after school care but - as Kelly says - there's more needed than this. Childcare is a shambles, it is very difficult to access, and unaffordable for so many.
Speaking on Radio National's Breakfast program this morning, Barbara Pocock, currently a Queen Elizabeth II Research Fellow and Associate Professor at the University of Adelaide, made the following points:
- There are more than 170,000 children whose parents are looking for childcare
- Cost and affordability are major impediments to accessing quality childcare
- The childcare system is designed by people who don’t use it
- The needs of parents have changed and the system has not changed to meet those needs
- The needs of children are not considered in the design and provision of quality childcare
- The quality of childcare and the quality of facilities is not not up to scratch
- There are problems with staffing: i.e. training levels; staffing ratios; and remuneration of qualified staff
- Childcare is not middle class welfare. The need and the problems extend across income boundaries
- If we get it wrong for the under 5s, we pay for it down the track for the next 20 years
- Parents need good options rather than the hotpotch prevailing at the moment.
- An experiment with longday care is still being trialled
- Market solutions to childcare needs to be looked at to determine whether the market is able to meet childcare demand adequately
- Record levels might be being spent, as the Government claims, but the growing proportion of the budget spent on childcare is only a response to the demand generated as women’s participation in the workforce increases and the Treasurer wants more women in the workforce.
Meanwhile, Senator Kay Patterson - the Minister responsible for Childcare as Minister for Family and Community Services and the Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for Women's Issues - is dragging the chain. Kay's style seems never to appear like she's pushing to get things done.
So there you are mums and dads and kids. If you want things to change, to improve get behind the efforts of Jackie and Tanya (you have real choice here - one Lib, one Lab) and give Costello and Patterson heaps of encouragement in the right direction. Meanswhile, Steve Fielding, the Family First Senator doesn't seem to have figured out how to keep his office going and take a January holiday at the same time - because there is a deathly silence from him on this very important family matter. Oh well!
Child care Childcare Jackie Kelly Janette Howard Tanya Plibersek Peter Costello Kay Patterson Steve Fielding Family First Working Mothers Women and work Barbara Pocock University of Adelaide Liberal Party of Australia Australian Labor Party
Sunday, January 15, 2006
This is a hate blog
Eagle’s Child also says (among other moony, misty things) that “No is a very conservative word”. I suspect neither she nor Leunig ever heard that word much when they were growing up.
Moony, misty. Such compliments! Better than hard-nosed, bitch, and worse. And, as for the parental child-rearing.... Well, I was an only child for six years until my sister arrived. My mother says that she and my father did everything perfectly and strictly with me. Proof of this is that I am the only non-tea-drinker in my family. This is due to the fact that my sister, unlike me, was allowed to drink tea from our father's saucer and has not stopped drinking it since. When we were older and I didn't quite understand my sister's risque jokes, my mother remarked
It's not your fault, love, that you were brought up genteel.
My schooling was entrusted to the Sisters of Show No Mercy who, in my day, were predominantly Irish. Girls who wore make-up, particularly to Mass on Sunday, were regarded as fast and loose. Getting a handle on the age, RebeccaH? Definitely pre-Dr Spock. But I did get to meet him when he and I were anti-Vietnam war protesters. Guess this makes me tainted, do you think? Just that I prefer yea-sayers who see all the possibilities to nay-sayers who like to control and censor.
Tim Blair
Leunig
Hate Blogs
Hate
Vietnam War
Dr Spock
Sisters of Mercy
Anti-war
Saturday, January 14, 2006
400+ and rising
Read more here and remember these words...
It is because no one listens to Iraqis talk about their suffering. That’s why
they kidnap foreigners, because it makes people and governments all around the
world listen to them.
Christian Peacemaker Teams
Captives
Iraq War
Peace
Lest we forget the captive Christian Peacemakers
Christian Peacemaker Teams
Captives
Iraq War
Peace
Christian progressives on the march...
Between a rock and a hard place
- a good return for taxpayers' dollars so that money has not gone down the drain on a poor bet;
- modern globalised corporations have to be accountable.
Corporations say they are accountable: but they are accountable on a very narrow base while ranging over vast distances. Corporations have to recognise their employees as stakeholders in the same way as shareholders are (not that they can't become part of the mushroom club too) and they have to be held accountable to the governments and communities in which they have their corporate base and in which they establish their business.
It has always bugged me that Australian corporations can pollute and deforest other nations in a manner that would not be permitted under Australian law without being held accountable at home. Not only should there be strong domestic accountability but there must be international accountability as well. You can't be a fine corporate citizen at home while being delinquent in responsibilities overseas - as BHP found at Ok Tedi.Accountability
Corporations
Corporate investment
Investment incentive
Globalization
Can we please see what we paid for and how?
Work in Freedom
Industrial Relations
Freedom of Information
Friday, January 13, 2006
Angus McMillan and the voice of history
Angus McMillan
Krowathunkooloong
Gippsland
SydneyCove
Preservation Island
Furneaux Group
Bairnsdale
Mount Isa
Kalkadoon
Charles Perkins
John Gore
Sir Joseph Banks
Leunig unloved?
Leunig is a beautiful and spiritual man. The constituency of the Jewish Museum has cut off its nose to spite its face in such rudeness that it withdraws its invitation. Perhaps it is pandering to the lowest common denominator of criticism. No is a very conservative word. Of course, it is not unheard of in the Australian Jewish community that it expresses its disapproval in a way that seems to go against the grain of the mainstream Australian community. This is particularly the case in Melbourne. It seems to me moreso than in Sydney. In a lot of cases, it will put the might of its political and financial influence behind its views. In a pluralist democractic society it, like anyone else, has every right to do so. But having the right to do so does not make the actions right. Having the right to do so does not always mean that it is wise to do so.
On learning of Leunig's disendorsement I am reminded of the stories of Greek immigrants who raised their children in the strict mores prevailing in their homeland when they immigrated. As teenagers and young adults, these children would return to Greece to meet family and home-grown Greek culture for the first time only to find that social mores in Greece were more liberal than that enforced by their parents. Similarly with language. Language is a living thing and the language of the homeland growing and flourishing in its native soil can be a different thing from the language of the diaspora which can be static by comparison. When I thought of these instances, I wondered if the Jewish diaspora are more defensive than it would be within national boundaries, less open to critical debate. But then I think the national boundaries of Israel are pretty defensive at this time with Ariel Sharon's build-your-own-ghetto scheme.
We need to remind ourselves that there are different ways of bullying and intimidation just as there are different types of power. There is the power that comes through violence expressed in military and physical prowess. At Cronulla, we saw bullying based on phsyical violence and numerical dominance by a particular group of people wrapped up in a repugnant nationalism. A number of those who have been put in jail and refused bail are of an ethnicity that has known in previous generations ghettoism, religious and ethnic prejudice, ethnic cleansing, and gross repression. There is bullying and intimidation of a more sophisticated kind which uses political influence and financial facilitation to get its way. Each are repugnant because neither relies on reason, interchange, and debate to make its point. Each decides there is one point and no other and sets about enforcing that point.
The one comfort in all this is that there are Jewish people in Australia and in Israel who agree with me. The difficulty is that the bullying voice is the one that grabs the headlines. The reasonable voice is only heard as it is sustained over time and distance and this requires great and consistent effort. I think of Robert Manne, Marcus Einfeldt, and other great Jewish civil liberties practitioners who realise that Jewish civil liberties benefit as the civil liberties of wider and mainstream society progress.
So I would say to the decision makers at the Jewish Museum of Australia, put things right. You have done one about face in withdrawing Leunig's invitation. Come full circle. Do another about face and reinstate the invitation. Let this be an occasion of reconciliation. Let this be an occasion where diverse viewpoints can be heard and considered. This is the way forward. Sure, it requires risk. It may even require putting oneself in the place of vulnerability. But this is the way we open ourselves to growth - like a tough clawed lobster outgrowing and shedding a hardened, no-longer-useful carapace.
Jewish Museum of Australia
Leunig
Cronulla
Melbourne
Israel
Ariel Sharon
Robert Manne
Marcus Einfeldt
Brokeback Mountain
The Proposition
Thursday, January 12, 2006
Will someone please buy Myer...
Now I have only lived in Melbourne for sixteen months. Myer, while a national retailer, is a Melbourne icon. David Jones, on the other hand, is the other national retailer and is a Sydney icon. I have to admit that Myer has long since ceased to look like a packapoo shop/jumble sale/$2 shop that it did in the days of Dennis Eck. There is no doubt that Dawn Robertson has done her best and tried to cover all bases - including doing what was considered impossible: changing the name of Myer's Sydney store, the historic Grace Bros, to Myer. Why then, if they want to sell Myer, aren't they making their stores more attractive and comfortable for the consumer whose cash they rely on. A few months ago, I bought some clothes at Myer at Knox City. The dressing rooms were hanging off the wall, mine had a hole in the wall, nowhere to put your clothes, your handbag. They might have been tolerable if they had been erected at a suburban Sunday market - but from someone purporting to be a national iconic retailer. You've got to be kidding! Similarly at Myer's Burke Street store this week. Went up to Shoes. The shoes were displayed according to style - not to size - on metal rack after metal rack like something from that other Coles Myer retailer, Target. Eventually, somewhere near the back of the department I found an appropriate shoe (one shoe only is displayed) and I asked for the other to try them on. Guess what? No shoe. Two or three searches were done - still no shoe. Consequently, no sale. I didn't look for anything else. Left the store muttering to myself "Never again!". I walked out of the front door of Myer and into the comfortable and relaxing ambience of DJs next door. How wonderful the contrast. Antique light shades, decorated ceiling, art deco lifts. I made by way to Shoes. DJs doesn't have sales: it has clearances. The shoes being cleared are placed on tables, in a jumble I'll admit, but they are according to size and DJ's customers are used to the procedure. I had soon found a shoe, got its pair, and was satisfied and completed the sale.
I've come to the conclusion that someone, somewhere along the line is milking Coles Myer for all their worth one way or another. Now we know that Brian Quinn, C-M's former CEO, ended up in jail. There seem to be few admirers of Solomon Lew's business practices and, too often, Lindsay Fox voted with him on the Coles-Myer Board. So please someone - buy the Myer stores and make them something worthy of the people whom you ask to spend money there. Invest in your clientele. But if Myer stores continue to be below par, spread the word - Myer is no longer an icon fit for Melbourne or anywhere else.
Tuesday, January 10, 2006
A strategy for peace?
Monday, January 09, 2006
An Australia of an independent mind?
Ethnic origins?
Saturday, January 07, 2006
Happy new year - with resolution
So when I wish you all that is good for 2006, this is the sort of good I mean.
My wishes for 2006?
Number One on my list are that the actions of Bush, Cheney and Howard become more and more transparent and understood for their nastiness and destruction - and, dare I say it, evil. I don't want Howard to resign but to remain as Prime Minister to bear the fruits of his labour. I don't want Bush impeached - Cheney for President is beyond imagining - and I think it is abhorrent for the most powerful nation in the world to have a lame duck head of state but I want him outed before his nation and the world and for the Democrats - who don't seem in any better shape than the ALP - to win the 2006 Congressional elections.
Number Two that Australia continues to acknowledge, as some have since Cronulla, that it is a racist country
Number Three that Australia begins to look at and discuss its colonizing attitudes in this country since Federation through to to-day and how these attitudes affect our racial attitudes and our attitudes to our neighbours in Africa, the Middle East, the South Pacific and Asia who have been subjected to colonization themselves.
Number Four that Australians as a nation forsake consumerism and stop trying to be the 51st state of the USA and move to a more reflective, considered, and spiritually informed lifestyle.
After those headliners, I wish for love and compassion; peace and creativity; hope and support for one another; joy for life and joy in one another; faith in ourselves and our Creator; and an understanding of ourselves in and of the wonderful creation that is our planet, our environment.
All these things, in my view, would not only be great to establish in 2006 but be a great basis for the nation, the individual, and me.